8 Best AI Resume Builders: The ATS Test
By Sayee Jadhav
Content Writer, TechLinos
Why ATS Decides Everything
AI resume builders solve the writing problem. They generate professional bullets, fix verb choice, optimize keyword density, and produce output in minutes instead of hours. What separates the leaders from the rest in 2026 is whether that polished output actually survives the ATS filter on the way to a recruiter. Two-column layouts, decorative icons, custom fonts, and creative graphics all look striking on screen and break ATS parsing in different ways across Workday, Greenhouse, Lever, and iCIMS.
The category has split into two camps. ATS-first tools like Rezi, Jobscan, and Teal prioritize parse rate and keyword optimization over visual flourish. Design-first tools like Enhancv, Kickresume, and Zety prioritize aesthetics with varying levels of ATS safety. The right choice depends entirely on whether the application path runs through an ATS or directly to a hiring manager.
Three Forces Shaping the Category in 2026
1. ATS parsing got stricter. Workday and Greenhouse updated parsers in 2025 to handle modern formats better, but the bar for what passes cleanly also rose. Many resume designs that worked in 2023 now fail. Tools that have not updated their templates show a measurable drop in parse rate.
2. AI authorship detection is not yet a real threat. Despite vendor marketing claims, ATS parsers do not detect AI authorship. Recruiters detect AI-generated content during human review only when phrasing is generic, metrics are vague, or content does not align with the role. Editing AI output removes most of these tells.
3. Free tiers got better, paywalls got worse. Teal and Kickresume offer free tiers that deliver real value with unlimited downloads on certain templates. Zety and Enhancv use a build-for-free-but-pay-to-download model that catches users mid-process. Rezi caps free downloads at 3 lifetime PDFs. Verify the free tier covers the actual workflow before committing time to any tool.
How The ATS Test Was Run
TechLinos editors generated 24 sample resumes across all 8 platforms over a four week testing window from April to May 2026. Each tool received three identical professional profiles and the resulting resumes were parsed through real ATS systems including Workday, Greenhouse, Lever, and iCIMS. Content quality was scored blind by three reviewers with HR backgrounds. Pricing was verified directly with each vendor at the time of publication.
Each tool received scores out of 10 across five dimensions: ATS Parse Rate, Content Quality, Design Within ATS Limits, Job Tailoring Accuracy, and Pricing Value. The overall TechLinos Score combines all five into a single 1 to 5 figure. Free tier limits, AI engine, output formats, and best fit candidate are listed alongside the scores.
ATS Parse Rate by Tool
The chart below shows the average ATS parse rate for each tool, calculated across Workday, Greenhouse, Lever, and iCIMS using the three test profiles. Parse rate measures the percentage of resume content that an ATS correctly extracts into structured fields. Higher is better; below 85 percent typically means contact details, work history, or skills are partially lost during parsing.
Two findings from the parse rate chart matter for tool selection. First, every ATS-first tool in the top half of the chart clears the 85 percent safety threshold by a comfortable margin. Second, the design-first tools (Kickresume and Enhancv) fall meaningfully below that threshold using their default visual templates. For roles that require ATS submission, choosing a design-first tool means committing to either using its ATS-safe template subset or accepting reduced parse rates on the way to a recruiter.
Reviews of All 8 AI Resume Builders
Each review below includes an ATS Scorecard with a radial overall score ring, dimension scores shown as segmented dot tracks, an About section, top features, pros and cons drawn from testing, and an Editor's Take. Tool names are anchored for direct linking.
Rezi
The ATS-first leader, delivering the highest parse rate of any tool tested and the deepest keyword optimization workflow for application-heavy job searches.
The ATS Test Scorecard
About Rezi
Rezi positions itself ATS-first and the product reflects that priority at every interaction point. The bullet editor surfaces ATS scoring inline, the keyword targeting tool flags missing terms against pasted job descriptions, and the template library is restricted to layouts that parse cleanly. During testing, every Rezi resume passed Workday parsing with full structured extraction and only minor field misclassifications in iCIMS. The trade off is a deliberately conservative visual aesthetic. Rezi resumes look professional but not striking, which is the right call for ATS-routed applications and the wrong call for direct-to-recruiter creative submissions.
Top Features
- Real-time ATS scoring: Inline scoring against parser readability and keyword density during bullet editing.
- AI keyword targeting: Paste a job description and Rezi flags missing keywords with suggestions for natural integration.
- AI bullet writing: Generates achievement-framed bullets from job titles and basic context, with quantified metrics where appropriate.
- ATS-safe template library: All templates restricted to single-column layouts that parse reliably in major ATS systems.
- Resume Review tool: Detailed AI feedback on existing resumes with specific rewrite suggestions per bullet.
- Highest parse rate of any tool tested at 97 percent average across four ATS systems
- Real-time scoring loop teaches users why specific phrasing helps or hurts ATS readability
- Keyword targeting against job descriptions is more accurate than any tested alternative
- Strong Trustpilot rating with consistent praise for the speed and clarity of the editing workflow
- Free tier caps PDF downloads at 3 lifetime, not per month, which makes free use impractical for active job searches
- Template aesthetics are conservative and will not stand out in design or creative role applications
- $29 per month Pro tier sits at the top of the category pricing range
- Limited cover letter and portfolio tooling compared to Kickresume or Teal
Teal
The all-in-one job search platform that combines AI resume building, job tracking, and application analytics into a single workspace with the most generous free tier in the category.
The ATS Test Scorecard
About Teal
Teal extends beyond resume building into a full job search workspace. The integrated job tracker pulls postings from LinkedIn, Indeed, and direct company pages, then surfaces keyword gaps when comparing each posting to the user's resume. During testing, Teal scored second on parse rate and first on workflow integration, with the unique advantage that the same platform handles resume drafting, application tracking, and follow-up reminders in one place. The free tier covers the actual job search workflow for most users without requiring an upgrade, which is unusual in the category. The Premium tier unlocks unlimited AI generations and advanced analytics, but the free tier remains usable indefinitely.
Top Features
- Match score per job: Paste any job posting and Teal scores how closely the existing resume matches against the role's keywords and requirements.
- Chrome extension capture: One-click save of job postings from LinkedIn, Indeed, and major ATS portals into the Teal tracker.
- Multi-resume variants: Maintain different resume versions for different role types, then tailor each to specific applications.
- Application tracker: Visual pipeline of applied, interviewing, offer, and rejected statuses with reminder triggers for follow-ups.
- Profile-based content reuse: Build a master profile once, then generate resume variants from the same source content.
- Most generous free tier in the category; usable indefinitely for the core job search workflow
- Integrated job tracker means resume tailoring and application management share one workspace
- Chrome extension cuts the time to capture job postings to a single click
- Match score loop teaches users exactly which keywords to add for each specific application
- Templates can overflow content onto a second page even with minimal additional sections
- Resume import from existing files occasionally misclassifies remote locations or job titles
- Download formats limited to PDF and Word; no direct Google Drive integration
- Premium tier at $29 per month is priced like a full builder, not a job tracker add-on
Kickresume
The template-rich design choice for creative roles and personal portfolio sites, with strong AI bullet generation but weaker ATS performance on default layouts.
The ATS Test Scorecard
About Kickresume
Kickresume leans into visual variety with the largest template library of any tool tested and bundles a personal portfolio website into the Premium tier. AI bullet generation runs on GPT-4 and produces achievement-framed content that scored second only to Rezi on writing quality during the panel review. Where Kickresume slips is parse rate: the default templates skew toward two-column layouts with sidebars and icons, which Workday and iCIMS parse less cleanly than single-column equivalents. The ATS-safe template subset exists and parses well, but it represents a fraction of the visual library. For roles where ATS routing matters less, such as creative agency applications or direct-to-hiring-manager outreach, Kickresume is the strongest design pick. For volume ATS applications, the parse rate trade off matters.
Top Features
- Largest template library: Over 35 designer-quality templates with industry-specific variants for tech, creative, healthcare, and academic roles.
- GPT-4 content generation: Generates entire resume sections from a job title and basic context, with strong achievement framing.
- Personal portfolio website: Premium tier includes a hosted portfolio website with the same content as the resume.
- LinkedIn import: One-click resume creation from a LinkedIn profile with field mapping to template layouts.
- Cover letter generator: AI cover letter drafting tied to specific job descriptions, included on all paid tiers.
- Largest template library in the category with the strongest visual design quality
- Free tier includes 4 templates with unlimited downloads, unique generosity at this design level
- Personal portfolio website bundled with Premium adds value no competitor in the test set matches
- LinkedIn import accuracy is the strongest of any tested tool for first-draft creation
- Default two-column templates parse poorly in Workday and iCIMS; users must select ATS-safe layouts manually
- ATS-safe template subset is smaller and visually weaker than the headline design library suggests
- Premium pricing pushes toward $19 per month tier for the strongest features, limiting free tier appeal
- Cover letter generation quality trails the resume bullet writing on the same platform
Jobscan
The ATS optimization specialist, originally built as an analyzer for existing resumes and now expanded with AI resume building tied to its proprietary ATS scoring engine.
The ATS Test Scorecard
About Jobscan
Jobscan started as a pure ATS analyzer that scored existing resumes against pasted job postings, and the recent resume builder addition treats that scoring engine as the centerpiece. The result is the strongest job-to-resume matching workflow in the category: paste any posting and Jobscan returns a match score, missing keywords, formatting flags, and rewrite suggestions in a single view. Parse rate tied with Rezi at 96 percent during testing. The trade off is on the building side: Jobscan templates are the most utilitarian in the category, with limited visual variety, and the $49.95 per month Premium tier sits well above competing all-in-one builders. For candidates with an existing resume that needs to pass an ATS gate, Jobscan is the strongest auditor. For first-time builders, the price-to-features ratio favors alternatives.
Top Features
- Match score against job postings: Detailed score breakdown across keyword match, skills match, education match, and ATS formatting per individual job.
- Power Edit: Inline editing tool that highlights missing keywords and suggests integration phrases without rewriting full sections.
- LinkedIn Optimization tool: Separate scoring engine for LinkedIn profile sections against target job descriptions.
- Cover letter scanner: Cover letter optimization tied to the same match-score workflow as the resume tool.
- Premium reporting: Detailed PDF reports per resume scan that document the optimization decisions made.
- Tied for highest parse rate in the test set at 96 percent average across ATS systems
- Match score workflow is the most actionable in the category for keyword and skill gap closure
- LinkedIn Optimization tool extends value beyond just the resume itself
- Premium reporting documents optimization decisions, useful for tracking what works across applications
- Premium pricing at $49.95 per month is the highest in the test set by a clear margin
- Template visual variety is the most limited; design quality trails every other tool tested
- Free tier of 5 scans is consumed quickly; meaningful use requires paid signup
- Building from scratch is workable but less intuitive than dedicated builders like Rezi or Teal
Enhancv
The design-forward choice with the strongest visual templates in the category, suited for personality-driven applications where look and feel matter as much as parse rate.
The ATS Test Scorecard
About Enhancv
Enhancv builds resumes that read more like personal brand documents than ATS-tuned application forms. The signature is a set of optional sections (personal interests, "my life philosophy," strengths, languages with proficiency bars) that other tools either omit or hide. Visual templates use color blocks, graphic dividers, and icon-driven section headers. During testing, Enhancv produced the most striking output of any tool but also the lowest parse rate at 73 percent average across the four ATS systems, with iCIMS and Workday losing structured field extraction on the default two-column layouts. The platform offers an ATS-safe template subset that performs better, but the experience is partly designed around the more visual options. For applications routed through hiring managers, recruiters, or directly to founders, Enhancv produces resumes that get attention. For high-volume ATS submission, the parse rate trade off is real.
Top Features
- Personality sections: Optional sections for interests, philosophy, strengths, and language proficiency unique among tested builders.
- Color and graphic templates: The strongest visual design library in the test set, with bold typography and color accent options.
- ATS Check tool: Built-in analyzer that scores the active resume against a pasted job description, similar to Jobscan match scoring.
- Content suggestions library: Pre-written bullet examples organized by role and skill, with one-click customization.
- Multi-page resume support: Strongest handling of two-page resumes among tested builders for senior candidates.
- Strongest visual design quality of any tested builder; output communicates personality clearly
- Personality and soft skills sections add dimension that pure ATS builders cannot replicate
- Built-in ATS Check tool means design choices can be validated against specific job postings before submission
- Multi-page support handles senior candidate resumes more cleanly than single-page-focused tools
- Default templates parse below 75 percent in major ATS systems; users must consciously select ATS-safe layouts
- No permanent free tier; the 7-day trial puts pressure on evaluation timelines
- All downloads watermarked until subscription, including during the trial
- Premium pricing at $25 per month is mid-range but Pro features unlock at a higher tier
Resume Worded
The LinkedIn-focused AI resume tool with a scoring engine that grades both resumes and LinkedIn profiles against the same role-specific benchmarks.
The ATS Test Scorecard
About Resume Worded
Resume Worded splits attention between resume and LinkedIn optimization, with the scoring engine as the shared backbone. The resume side analyzes existing content against role-specific benchmarks drawn from a curated dataset of strong resumes, then offers targeted rewrites at the bullet level. The LinkedIn side runs the same logic against profile sections, including headline, summary, and experience bullets. During testing, Resume Worded scored well on parse rate (8.5 of 10) but trailed Rezi and Teal on first-draft generation quality, with the platform favoring revision over composition. For candidates whose job search runs primarily through LinkedIn outreach rather than ATS submissions, the dual-surface scoring delivers value no pure resume builder matches.
Top Features
- Resume Score: Composite score across impact, brevity, style, and ATS readability with line-by-line feedback.
- LinkedIn Review: Parallel scoring engine for LinkedIn headline, summary, and experience sections.
- Targeted Resume: Generates a version of the active resume tailored to a specific job description.
- Bullet Analyzer: Per-bullet feedback on impact verbs, metric placement, and missing context.
- Sample Lines library: 250,000+ bullet examples organized by role, useful as patterns rather than verbatim copy.
- LinkedIn scoring engine is unique among AI resume builders and adds meaningful value for networking-driven searches
- Sample Lines library at 250,000+ entries is the largest content reference in the test set
- Free tier remains usable for ongoing audits, not just an evaluation surface
- Per-bullet feedback teaches resume writing principles rather than just rewriting bullets opaquely
- First-draft generation quality trails Rezi and Teal; the platform favors editing existing resumes over creating new ones
- Template variety is limited; the design surface is utilitarian compared to Kickresume or Enhancv
- Premium pricing at $19 per month is fair but Pro tier features unlock at $49 per month
- LinkedIn integration depends on manual paste of profile content, not direct OAuth import
Novoresume
The simplicity-focused builder with a clean editor and a manual-first workflow that uses AI as a content assist rather than a generator-from-scratch tool.
The ATS Test Scorecard
About Novoresume
Novoresume takes a different stance from the rest of the test set: AI is positioned as an assistant, not the primary writer. The editor presents a structured fill-in workflow with templates that look modern but parse cleanly, and AI features surface as inline suggestions rather than full bullet generation. During testing, this approach produced more user-voice content than competing tools, which favored the AI's house style. The trade off is that Novoresume requires more user input to reach a polished result. For users who find AI-generated bullets generic and prefer to write their own resume with strategic AI assistance, Novoresume fits the workflow better than Rezi, Teal, or Kickresume. For users who want a finished draft in 10 minutes, the manual orientation gets in the way.
Top Features
- Manual-first editor: Structured form-based workflow with AI suggestions that appear only when requested.
- Single-page constraint by default: Templates enforce one-page output, useful for early-career candidates and conservative industries.
- Style consistency tooling: Automatic enforcement of consistent date formats, capitalization, and bullet structure across sections.
- Free single-page export: The basic single-page resume can be exported on the free tier without watermarks.
- European market focus: Stronger handling of European CV conventions than US-focused competitors.
- Manual-first workflow produces more authentic user-voice content than AI-generator-dominant tools
- Free tier supports single-page resume export without watermarks, unusual in the category
- Style consistency tooling catches small inconsistencies that recruiters notice but other tools miss
- Single-page constraint is correct for the majority of early-career resumes and reinforces good hygiene
- Slower to a finished draft than tools that generate content from minimal input
- Two-page resume support exists but is constrained compared to Enhancv or Rezi
- Job tailoring tools are less developed than Teal or Jobscan workflows
- Template variety is more limited than Kickresume or Zety, which may matter for visual differentiation
Zety
The beginner-friendly guided wizard with the most accessible workflow in the category, paired with a download paywall that defines the user complaint surface.
The ATS Test Scorecard
About Zety
Zety has the most beginner-friendly editor in the test set, with a step-by-step guided wizard that walks users through each resume section with prompts, examples, and AI-generated phrase suggestions at every input. For first-time resume writers or candidates re-entering the job market after time away, the workflow removes most decision friction. The defining tension is commercial: users can build and preview a complete resume for free, then hit the download paywall on the way out, with subscription required to export the finished document. This pattern shows up consistently in user reviews as the primary complaint. ATS parse rate and design quality are both competent, content quality is mid-range, but the workflow design produces strong completion rates from beginner users where other tools see drop-off.
Top Features
- Guided wizard: Step-by-step flow that prompts each section with examples, suggested phrases, and AI completion.
- Job-title phrase library: Pre-written bullet starters organized by job title, useful for candidates without resume-writing experience.
- Template variety: Over 20 templates across professional, modern, creative, and simple aesthetic categories.
- Cover letter generator: Tied to the same content library and step-by-step flow as the resume tool.
- Multilingual support: Resume building in multiple languages for international job seekers.
- Most accessible editor in the test set for first-time resume writers
- Guided wizard removes most decision friction during the build process
- Template variety and aesthetic range satisfy most non-creative role applications
- Multilingual support is unique among major tested builders, useful for international candidates
- Download paywall creates frustration after time investment in the build; consistent user complaint
- Job tailoring is the weakest in the test set; no integrated job posting match scoring
- Content quality skews generic; AI suggestions read as templated rather than specific
- Subscription auto-renewal terms have drawn complaints in user reviews regarding refund difficulty
Quality vs Price Positioning
The chart below plots each tool on two axes: monthly entry-tier price (X) and overall output quality (Y, drawn from the five-dimension TechLinos Score normalized to a 0 to 10 scale). The four quadrants describe the value position. Tools in the upper left deliver strong output at an affordable price; tools in the upper right justify a premium with the strongest results; tools in the lower right charge premium prices for mid-range output; tools in the lower left are budget options with proportional output.
The chart surfaces three useful patterns. Rezi, Teal, and Kickresume cluster in the upper portion at competitive prices, validating them as default category picks. Jobscan sits alone in the upper right with the highest price for strong-but-not-leading output, justifying the cost only when the match-score workflow is the primary use case. Zety occupies the lower middle: acceptable quality, mid-range price, but the build-then-pay-to-download model creates the friction that pushes its value score lower than the chart position alone suggests.
Match Tool to Job Seeker
The right tool depends as much on the application path as on the resume itself. The matches below pair candidate situations with the strongest fit from the test set, with backup options where the primary pick has known constraints.
Backup: Kickresume for the bundled personal portfolio site.
Backup: Resume Worded for LinkedIn profile parallel optimization.
Backup: Enhancv when distinctive design helps direct-to-recruiter outreach.
Backup: Novoresume for a less-pressured manual workflow with free single-page export.
Backup: Resume Worded when feedback on existing wording matters more than AI generation.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Mistakes that surfaced repeatedly during testing and across user reviews, regardless of which tool was used.
Trusting the default template
Many builders default to two-column or sidebar layouts because they look polished in the editor. Workday, Greenhouse, and iCIMS all parse these layouts less cleanly than single-column equivalents. Check the template's ATS classification before building, not after. Most tools tag ATS-safe templates explicitly; the unlabeled ones generally fail at the same rate as Enhancv's default did during testing.
Treating AI output as final
The fastest way to produce a generic resume is to accept AI-generated bullets without editing. Every tool tested produced at least one bullet per resume that needed editing for accuracy, voice, or specificity. Use AI for drafting, not authoring. Add specific context only the candidate knows. Replace round-number metrics with precise ones. Vary sentence structure across bullets to avoid the templated pattern that recruiters now recognize as AI signature.
Skipping the download paywall check
Zety, Enhancv, and several others let users build and preview complete resumes for free, then require subscription to export. Spending two hours on a Zety resume and discovering the paywall after is a common user complaint. Verify the free tier covers the actual workflow, including export, before committing time. If paywall friction matters, Kickresume and Teal both offer free downloads on their free tiers.
Ignoring keyword tailoring per role
A single master resume submitted across multiple roles will underperform a tailored variant for the same effort budget. Tools like Teal, Jobscan, and Rezi explicitly support keyword tailoring against pasted job descriptions. The gain from spending 10 extra minutes per application on keyword tuning is measurable in ATS match scores and, by extension, in callback rates. Skipping this step removes most of the value AI builders provide.
Picking the wrong tool for the application path
Design-first tools are correct for some applications and wrong for others. Submitting an Enhancv resume to a Workday-routed enterprise application drops parse rate to 73 percent and loses structured data. Submitting a Rezi resume to a creative agency direct outreach throws away the visual distinctiveness the role rewards. The decision starts with the application path, not the tool: ATS or human review first.
Frequently Asked Questions
Will an AI-generated resume get flagged by employers?
AI-generated resumes are not flagged by ATS parsers themselves. ATS systems parse content; they do not detect AI authorship. Where flags happen is in human review: recruiters who notice generic AI phrasing, hallucinated job titles, or fabricated metrics may discount the resume. The fix is editing AI output rather than submitting it raw. Treat AI as a drafting assistant, not a final author. Tools that ground content in user-uploaded experience (Rezi, Teal, Jobscan) produce less generic output than tools that generate from scratch.
Are AI resumes actually ATS-friendly?
Some are. Most are not without configuration. Rezi and Jobscan are built ATS-first and consistently parse cleanly in Workday, Greenhouse, Lever, and iCIMS. Teal and Resume Worded perform well when users follow ATS-safe template choices. Enhancv, Kickresume, and Zety can produce designs that look stunning but break ATS parsing because of two-column layouts, icons, or graphics. Always preview the resume as plain text or run it through an ATS checker before submitting to any job that uses an applicant tracking system.
Can recruiters tell I used AI to write my resume?
Recruiters who review hundreds of resumes weekly are getting better at spotting generic AI phrasing. Common tells include identical bullet structures (Led, Drove, Spearheaded patterns), vague metrics with suspiciously round numbers, achievements that do not align with the stated role, and verbose openings that do not exist in standard resume writing. Editing the AI output, adding specific context only the candidate would know, and varying sentence structure removes most of these signals. The risk is not using AI; the risk is submitting AI output without editing it.
Is it safe to put my LinkedIn or personal information into these tools?
Read the privacy policy before uploading any resume or pasting LinkedIn data. Major builders (Rezi, Teal, Kickresume, Enhancv, Jobscan) state they do not sell user data and use uploaded content only to power the service. Smaller and newer tools have variable practices. The safest workflow is to use generic placeholder data during evaluation, then add real personal information only after committing to a tool. Verify the platform supports account deletion that actually removes uploaded content, not just hides it.
Final Verdict
The 2026 AI resume builder category has stratified into a clear two-tier structure that simplifies tool selection. Rezi and Teal share the top of the test set at 4.7 of 5, distinguished by emphasis rather than quality. Rezi optimizes the individual resume against ATS parsers; Teal optimizes the job search workflow around it. Either is the right default. Choose Rezi when application paths run primarily through ATS and keyword precision matters. Choose Teal when volume tracking, multi-resume variants, and an integrated workspace matter more than incremental parse rate gains.
Below the top tier, tool selection becomes a function of application path. Kickresume and Enhancv reward applications where design distinctiveness carries weight. Jobscan is the strongest audit tool when an existing resume needs to clear an ATS gate. Resume Worded earns its place when LinkedIn outreach drives meaningful share of the search. Novoresume fits user-voice purists. Zety meets first-time builders where they are, with the caveat that the download paywall friction is real.
The category is converging on the same underlying engine (GPT-4 with platform-specific keyword libraries), which means content quality differences are narrowing across tools. What remains differentiated is the workflow: whether the platform optimizes for the resume itself, the entire application process, the visual brand, the LinkedIn parallel, or the beginner walk-through. Start with the application path, match the workflow that fits it, and the right tool follows.
Sayee Jadhav
Content Writer, TechLinos
Sayee Jadhav covers AI-driven productivity tools, hiring technology, and the consumer SaaS category for TechLinos. For this article, Sayee led the four-week ATS Test, generating 24 sample resumes across 8 platforms and coordinating blind scoring with a three-person review panel that included HR and recruiting professionals. Resumes were parsed through Workday, Greenhouse, Lever, and iCIMS at standard recruiter-side configurations, with parse rate calculated from successful structured field extraction.
The TechLinos editorial process holds vendors at arm's length: no commercial relationships, no sponsored placements, no priority for advertisers. Pricing, parse rates, and scoring reflect testing conducted between April and May 2026.